<blockquote><a href="/users/116817">WebDeveloper</a> <a href="/topics/39239#posts-188630">wrote</a>: Or am I worrying needlessly</blockquote> Yes. The fear of unsafeWindow is pointless and stupid (in my eyes). I have yet to see a website do damage through it. If you really wanted to, check out unsafeWindow.CommentChange.toString() to see what it's doing and replicate it from a "safe" scope. <blockquote><a href="/users/116817">WebDeveloper</a> <a href="/topics/39239#posts-188630">wrote</a>: Or am I worrying needlessly</blockquote> Yes. The fear of unsafeWindow is pointless and stupid (in my eyes). I have yet to see a website do damage through it. If you really wanted to, check out unsafeWindow.CommentChange.toString() to see what it's doing and replicate it from a "safe" scope.

2009-11-09T18:22:25Z

Forum

188654

39239

2009-11-09T18:43:54Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

61251

<pre>location.href = "javascript:CommentChange(document.getElementById(\"ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder\")," + DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER + ");";</pre> <pre>location.href = "javascript:CommentChange(document.getElementById(\"ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder\")," + DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER + ");";</pre>

2009-11-09T18:12:32Z

Forum

188652

39239

2009-11-09T18:12:32Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101601 Firefox/3.0.15

55607

Instead of using thumb.png, can we use large.png? And a width of 126px would take care of overflowing issues. As is, wide logos always get cropped. Here's a script which does this: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/61584 and a script which has a cropped logo: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/31864 Instead of using thumb.png, can we use large.png? And a width of 126px would take care of overflowing issues. As is, wide logos always get cropped. Here's a script which does this: <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/61584">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/61584</a> and a script which has a cropped logo: <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/31864">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/31864</a>

2009-11-09T18:08:18Z

Forum

188649

39246

2009-11-09T18:11:09Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

61251

When I go to my public profile, the subnav list on the left shows: forum posts 2 but when I click on "forum posts" or "2", the resulting page shows "0 posts found". How can I view the old posts, or at least see the forums and/or scripts where they were made? [edit: of course, now that I've posted a question in the Userscripts.org discussion forum, the # of posts is 3, with the resulting page showing just the 1 post in this forum] When I go to my public profile, the subnav list on the left shows: forum posts 2 but when I click on "forum posts" or "2", the resulting page shows "0 posts found". How can I view the old posts, or at least see the forums and/or scripts where they were made? [edit: of course, now that I've posted a question in the Userscripts.org discussion forum, the # of posts is 3, with the resulting page showing just the 1 post in this forum]

2009-11-09T17:44:15Z

Forum

188641

39243

2009-11-09T17:45:24Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 GTB5

108636

The Toronto Star newspaper site insists on displaying article comments starting with the newest comment. There is a dropdown allowing me to change the display order, but the site doesn't keep track of my choice - I need to switch the darn display order every time I read a new article. I have written a script which successfully changes the display to "oldest first", but it uses one of the Star's data-load functions via unsafeWindow. The script works, but I feel dirty. B^) Can you help me successfully use an unsafeWindow alternative? __________ The site's dropdown is coded like this: <pre>&lt;select onchange="CommentChange(this, event);" id="ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder" name="ctl00$UserCommentsLayer$SortOrder"&gt; </pre> so when a user changes the display order, CommentChange() is called. Here's my script, minus the header: <pre>var DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER = 1; // Oldest first (function() { document.getElementById("ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder").selectedIndex=DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER; unsafeWindow.CommentChange(document.getElementById("ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder"),DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER); })()</pre> It works fine: when a Toronto Star page is loaded, the dropdown will be changed to "Oldest first" and the comments area reloaded. But how can I recode the CommentChange calll to get rid of unsafeWindow? (Or am I worrying needlessly?) Thanks! The Toronto Star newspaper site insists on displaying article comments starting with the newest comment. There is a dropdown allowing me to change the display order, but the site doesn't keep track of my choice - I need to switch the darn display order every time I read a new article. I have written a script which successfully changes the display to "oldest first", but it uses one of the Star's data-load functions via unsafeWindow. The script works, but I feel dirty. B^) Can you help me successfully use an unsafeWindow alternative? __________ The site's dropdown is coded like this: <pre>&lt;select onchange="CommentChange(this, event);" id="ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder" name="ctl00$UserCommentsLayer$SortOrder"&gt; </pre> so when a user changes the display order, CommentChange() is called. Here's my script, minus the header: <pre>var DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER = 1; // Oldest first (function() { document.getElementById("ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder").selectedIndex=DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER; unsafeWindow.CommentChange(document.getElementById("ctl00_UserCommentsLayer_SortOrder"),DEFAULT_SORT_ORDER); })()</pre> It works fine: when a Toronto Star page is loaded, the dropdown will be changed to "Oldest first" and the comments area reloaded. But how can I recode the CommentChange calll to get rid of unsafeWindow? (Or am I worrying needlessly?) Thanks!

2009-11-09T17:15:52Z

Forum

188630

39239

2009-11-09T17:17:40Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

116817

Hi, how can i view ALL "older post" with one click in profile? thanks for reply Hi, how can i view ALL "older post" with one click in profile? thanks for reply

2009-11-09T14:04:23Z

Forum

188608

39233

2009-11-09T14:04:23Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; cs; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 ImageShackToolbar/5.2.3

116905

people need to do something better with their life vs steal other peoples things..that's just stupid... people need to do something better with their life vs steal other peoples things..that's just stupid...

2009-11-09T08:53:20Z

Forum

188568

704

2009-11-09T08:53:20Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5

89578

Then you use listeners and timeouts. Then you use listeners and timeouts.

2009-11-09T04:49:44Z

Forum

188538

39198

2009-11-09T04:49:44Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

<blockquote><a href="/users/23652">JoeSimmons</a> <a href="/topics/35055#posts-188515">wrote</a>: Yeah I was wondering that too. How would it pile up memory?</blockquote> me too but some unrelated stuff: I found out some dhtml games a while ago, and they all seem to be quite old, but interesting: http://www.javascriptgaming.com/ played those a while when i got bored of flash games <blockquote><a href="/users/23652">JoeSimmons</a> <a href="/topics/35055#posts-188515">wrote</a>: Yeah I was wondering that too. How would it pile up memory?</blockquote> me too but some unrelated stuff: I found out some dhtml games a while ago, and they all seem to be quite old, but interesting: <a href="http://www.javascriptgaming.com/">http://www.javascriptgaming.com/</a> played those a while when i got bored of flash games

2009-11-09T04:02:09Z

Forum

188525

35055

2009-11-09T04:02:09Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

72707

I like python's for ... in so much js should learn from that one too :) saves the typing I like python's for ... in so much js should learn from that one too :) saves the typing

2009-11-09T03:53:58Z

Forum

188523

35546

2009-11-09T03:53:58Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

72707

well, the issue seems to be closed, but I guess it's still good to put a warning if the user forgot about it I hate errors when it's so hard to find out the problem, and there's absolutely no indication where the bug's coming from well, the issue seems to be closed, but I guess it's still good to put a warning if the user forgot about it I hate errors when it's so hard to find out the problem, and there's absolutely no indication where the bug's coming from

2009-11-09T03:52:39Z

Forum

188522

39139

2009-11-09T03:52:39Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

72707

what if I only want to send the clicks at specific times and I don't want it to be persistent? what if I only want to send the clicks at specific times and I don't want it to be persistent?

2009-11-09T03:45:58Z

Forum

188519

39198

2009-11-09T03:45:58Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3

82831

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/Yansky">Yansky</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35055#row-188514"> wrote</a>: <pre> pass();//prevent memory pile up </pre> Memory pile up?</blockquote> Yeah I was wondering that too. How would it pile up memory? <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/Yansky">Yansky</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35055#row-188514"> wrote</a>: <pre> pass();//prevent memory pile up </pre> Memory pile up?</blockquote> Yeah I was wondering that too. How would it pile up memory?

2009-11-09T03:38:57Z

Forum

188515

35055

2009-11-09T03:38:57Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

<pre> pass();//prevent memory pile up </pre> Memory pile up? <pre> pass();//prevent memory pile up </pre> Memory pile up?

2009-11-09T03:37:09Z

Forum

188514

35055

2009-11-09T03:37:09Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

26957

That's pretty awesome... However, it goes a little fast, and on pages like GBATEMP, it goes through control panel. But it's fun to play around with. That's pretty awesome... However, it goes a little fast, and on pages like GBATEMP, it goes through control panel. But it's fun to play around with.

2009-11-09T02:56:23Z

Forum

188501

35055

2009-11-09T02:56:23Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

115937

Well that's no problem, you'd just refresh the page to download the file after streaming. It's a minimal bother. At least on mediafire. It actually already works using lifehacker's "google inline mp3 player" script, but only sometimes depending on how fast the link is prepared by mediafire. If it's prepared before the script processes the page it works like a charm. So if someone would only implement some kind of script execution delay it would work every time. Well that's no problem, you'd just refresh the page to download the file after streaming. It's a minimal bother. At least on mediafire. It actually already works using lifehacker's "google inline mp3 player" script, but only sometimes depending on how fast the link is prepared by mediafire. If it's prepared before the script processes the page it works like a charm. So if someone would only implement some kind of script execution delay it would work every time.

2009-11-09T02:53:08Z

Forum

188499

38654

2009-11-09T02:53:08Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091016 Firefox/3.5.4

33038

I would be very grateful to anyone who designed a script that showed the IMDb ratings on Netflix. Another request would be Netflix genre keywords on IMDb. Increasing IMDb's top movies would be nice, too. I would be very grateful to anyone who designed a script that showed the IMDb ratings on Netflix. Another request would be Netflix genre keywords on IMDb. Increasing IMDb's top movies would be nice, too.

2009-11-08T23:47:52Z

Forum

188475

39202

2009-11-08T23:47:52Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

116816

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/107463">kooks</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35546#row-188466"> wrote</a>: You are using for...each incorrectly,</blockquote> Actually no he is not. It works perfectly. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/107463">kooks</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35546?page=1#row-188466"> wrote</a>: for..each iterates over all an objects properties.</blockquote> Wrong. <code>for()</code> does... <code>for each()</code> does not. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/107463">kooks</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35546#row-188466"> wrote</a>: You are using for...each incorrectly,</blockquote> Actually no he is not. It works perfectly. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/107463">kooks</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35546?page=1#row-188466"> wrote</a>: for..each iterates over all an objects properties.</blockquote> Wrong. <code>for()</code> does... <code>for each()</code> does not.

2009-11-08T23:46:05Z

Forum

188474

35546

2009-11-08T23:47:30Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

Edit: Opps, this post is wrong ignore it. Saved for prosperity: <s>You are using for...each incorrectly, for..each iterates over all an objects properties. Therefore it will iterate over document.images.length and other properties of document.images</s> Edit: Opps, this post is wrong ignore it. Saved for prosperity: <s>You are using for...each incorrectly, for..each iterates over all an objects properties. Therefore it will iterate over document.images.length and other properties of document.images</s>

2009-11-08T23:22:07Z

Forum

188466

35546

2009-11-09T16:38:23Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

107463

You are right! It has something to do with the table cells as seen below <img src="http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/3884/imagemnao.png" /> Hopefully I'll find a workaround for this You are right! It has something to do with the table cells as seen below <img src="http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/3884/imagemnao.png" /> Hopefully I'll find a workaround for this

2009-11-08T23:18:03Z

Forum

188465

39172

2009-11-08T23:22:47Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101601 Firefox/3.0.15

55607

<blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/userscriptfan2009">userscriptfa...</a> <a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35546#row-188334"> wrote</a>: bumped</blockquote> I'm not signing up, please give a login. <blockquote><a href="http://userscripts.org/users/userscriptfan2009">userscriptfa...</a><a href="http://userscripts.org/topics/35546#row-188334"> wrote</a>: bumped</blockquote> I'm not signing up, please give a login.

2009-11-08T23:15:30Z

Forum

188463

35546

2009-11-08T23:15:30Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

23652

button?<pre>document.evaluate("id('fire')", document, null, XPathResult.ANY_UNORDERED_NODE_TYPE, null).singleNodeValue.click();</pre>it doesn't work if the element is a link button?<pre>document.evaluate("id('fire')", document, null, XPathResult.ANY_UNORDERED_NODE_TYPE, null).singleNodeValue.click();</pre>it doesn't work if the element is a link

2009-11-08T23:05:59Z

Forum

188459

39198

2009-11-08T23:07:06Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101601 Firefox/3.0.15

55607

Is is possible to send a mouse click to any button that has an ID="fire" for example? If so, what's the code? Is is possible to send a mouse click to any button that has an ID="fire" for example? If so, what's the code?

2009-11-08T22:43:01Z

Forum

188454

39198

2009-11-08T22:43:01Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3

82831

Hmm, I'm not sure if this is what you want but give it a go. <pre>document.body.style.opacity = 0.2</pre> Hmm, I'm not sure if this is what you want but give it a go. <pre>document.body.style.opacity = 0.2</pre>

2009-11-08T22:25:44Z

Forum

188446

37208

2009-11-08T22:25:44Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091102 Firefox/3.5.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)

107463

bump... anybody? bump... anybody?

2009-11-08T22:05:42Z

Forum

188433

38895

2009-11-08T22:05:42Z

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3

95141